Intrafoundation Software
Making Atomic Warfare Fun Again
News & Forums Active Projects Queued Projects | War & Politics God Cryptography Operating Systems Game Development | Writings Poetry Film Making Wisdom | ColdFusion ASP COM Objects Javascript Web Design Java | Photography Raytracing DOS Software

| Need a shoulder to cry on while trying to convince Windows to properly work with our software? Just want to chat about something related to the site? Feel free to use the forums slash news slash blog. (Unsolicited commercial spam will be deleted, obviously.) | Looking for something?

This is thread 168. The complete list of threads is available on the main forums page.

Subject: RE:CFMX Problems w/CFX and COM Author: Christina Shafer Date/Time: 4/10/2003 1:16:17 PM (168.0) Hi Lewis, We are considering upgrading to CF MX, but may postpone that upgrade if CFX_groups, CFX_users and CFX_permissions tags won`t work. Your posting on this subject is from July 2002. What is the current status? Thanks! Christina
Subject: RE:RE:CFMX Problems w/CFX and COM Author: Lewis Sellers Date/Time: 4/16/2003 2:48:29 PM (170.168) I haven`t used CF in a few months (primarily because of all the endless problems with CFMX*), but I briefly checked when the CFMX update 2 became available. It seemed to be working then -- at least on the computer I tried it on. I didn`t do any extensive multi-computer testing however so I can`t vouch for it on any computer other than that one. :) About the only thing I can say is to cautiously install an eval version on a few dev machines with CFMX update 2 and see if it responds properly. The main issue with CFMX was that it seemed to bugger up the ADSI interface, which of course being a set of COM calls in the CFX`s makes sense. All the functions of the post-NT tags that used the active directory technology simply were failing to get any results from the ADSI calls. (*Speaking of which, seems the switch to an all ASP intrafoundation.com a few hours after your post was a little premature. Apparently not all the drivers were installed on the dedicated server during the move last week. Oops.:) --min
Subject: RE:RE:CFMX Problems w/CFX and COM Author: Christina Shafer Date/Time: 6/12/2003 5:47:25 PM (193.168) Hi Lewis, Just a quick update... I did install an eval version of CFMX and tested out the portions of our code using the cfx_users, cfx_groups and cfx_permissions tags. The cfx_users and cfx_permissions tags worked fine, however, I was not able to get the cfx_groups to work. I found all the local group functionality I needed in the cfx_usermanager tag, though, so we are satisfied that should we be able to upgrade without significant problems in the future. Thanks! Christina
Subject: RE:RE:CFMX Problems w/CFX and COM Author: Lewis Sellers Date/Time: 6/17/2003 12:39:07 PM (195.168) I`m glad you got it straightened out. It`s been so long now since I actively worked on IHTK that I`m uncomfortably sure than many of it`s regular users are now more familiar with it`s operations than I am. :-) --min

| REPLY
--- | ---
Author: |
Subject: |
Your Message: |
Email: (optional) |

`(Note: For safety all HTML in your message text may be printed exactly as you typed it.)`
top